← Back to DeFlock Bay Area

The evidence.
Verify it yourself.

This page is the evidence layer for factual claims on DeFlock Livermore. Primary City and Police sources are linked directly wherever available.

Documented stated in the record (click to open it) · Calculated our arithmetic from documented figures (hover or tap to see it) · Unknown not established by any record we have.

Livermore ALPR fact sheet — checked 17 October 2026

Documented · LPD ↗

Vendor / technology

Livermore Police says it uses Flock Safety technology, retroactive search and real-time hot-list alerts.

Documented · Policy 460 ↗

A second ALPR system

Policy 460.5.3 lets authorized users search ALPR information through Flock or Motorola, with separate query requirements for each.

Documented · 2025 report ↗

Camera count — 2025

LPD's 2025 ALPR Annual Report lists 78 ALPR cameras. This is a dated count and can change.

Documented · Flock portal ↗

Camera count — October 2026

The Flock portal lists 148 total active cameras: 75 Flock ALPR cameras and 73 non-Flock "ALPR capable" traffic cameras (updated 17 Oct 2026).

Documented · Policy 460 ↗ Documented · 2025 report ↗ Documented · Flock portal ↗

Retention

Policy 460.6: stored for a minimum of one year, then purged unless it is or may become evidence. The 2025 report says data is deleted within one year. The portal lists 365 days.

Documented · Policy 460 ↗

Search requirements

Before a Flock query, users must enter an offense type, a case or CAD number and a reason. All access is logged (Policy 460.5.3).

Documented · Flock portal ↗Calculated

Collection scale — 30 days

1,201,553 unique vehicles detected, 238 LPD search sessions and 10,897 hotlist hits in the 30 days to 17 Oct 2026. Our calculation: about 5,000 vehicles recorded per search session.

Documented · 2025 report ↗

Reported outcomes — 2025

225 stolen-vehicle hits, 23 felony-vehicle hits and 84 calls for service generated from ALPR information.

Documented ceiling · Council minutes ↗

Flock contract ceiling

Resolution 2025-088 raised the Flock agreement to a not-to-exceed amount of $815,000. The Council approved it 5–0 on the 9 June 2025 Consent Calendar. This is a ceiling, not actual spending.

Documented · City CIP ↗

FY 2025–26 budget

$55,000 for project PS201722, Automated License Plate Readers, funded by Asset Seizure – County. This is a project appropriation, not total historical Flock spending.

Documented · City CIP ↗

Planned expansion

The City's project description says PS201722 will increase the number of ALPR systems, with remaining installations including the downtown core after the L Street Garage is completed.

Documented · Flock portal ↗Calculated

Sharing list

The Flock portal lists the organizations granted access to Livermore's data. By our count, there were 340 on 17 Oct 2026.

Documented · Policy 460 ↗

Livermore's sharing limits

Policy 460.8 allows sharing only with California public agencies as permitted by law. It bars private, federal and out-of-state access except narrow, legally permitted functions.

Documented · Civil Code ↗

California ALPR sharing restriction

Civil Code § 1798.90.55 says a public agency shall not sell, share or transfer ALPR information except to another public agency and only as otherwise permitted by law.

Documented · CA DOJ ↗

California DOJ interpretation

The California Attorney General's ALPR guidance states that federal and out-of-state law-enforcement agencies are not included in the statute's definition of a qualifying public agency, and says the restriction also applies to vendor-operated multi-agency ALPR databases.

Documented · CA DOJ ↗

Access logging requirements

California law requires ALPR operators that access or provide access to ALPR information to keep records of the date and time, query terms, user identity and affiliation, and purpose of access.

Documented · CA Attorney General ↗

State enforcement is active

In October 2025, the California Attorney General sued El Cajon over alleged sharing of ALPR data with out-of-state law-enforcement agencies.

Documented · City Council ↗ Documented · City Manager ↗ Documented · LPD contacts ↗

Decision-makers

Council members, districts, terms and office phone numbers were re-checked against the City Council page. The City Manager and Chief of Police office numbers were re-checked against their official pages. All checks done 17 Oct 2026.

What we could not verify

Unknown The records we have do not establish:

We keep these on file as open questions and as public-records targets, not as claims.

What we are not claiming

We are not presenting the $55,000 appropriation or the $815,000 contract ceiling as Livermore's actual Flock spending. We are not claiming SignalTrace is deployed in Livermore. We are not claiming a court has ruled Livermore's specific ALPR deployment unconstitutional. We are not claiming all 148 cameras on the Flock portal are plate readers; the portal itself describes 73 of them as "ALPR capable" traffic cameras. We are also not claiming that any specific agency on Livermore's sharing list is receiving data unlawfully unless and until the underlying records and law support that conclusion.

Corrections in this update (17 October 2026)

A standing invitation: check our work

You don't have to agree with our position to evaluate our evidence. Follow the sources, compare our wording with the underlying records, and tell us when something is wrong or incomplete.

REPORT AN ERROR OR A BETTER SOURCE →

f

Join DeFlock Livermore on Facebook

Connect with local residents, share information, organize and stay informed.

Join the DeFlock Livermore Facebook group →